However, those users also remark how newer versions make it easier and faster to tweak the settings in newer versions. I’ve known V-Ray users in the past that have told me how it can be daunting to use it because it can be complicated to set up and get the settings just right. While I think V-Ray GPU Next can be very useful to make work faster, I think the final images will always need the software-renderer. When I was testing it, I noticed the GPU-output can be vastly different to the CPU-output. V-Ray Next includes its own GPU-renderer, but I dare say it’s more of a quick render-preview tool than a GPU-based alternative to the software renderer. I can’t really say that not being able to output HDR images is a bad thing because, if you want to use those images or videos for a presentation where you won’t be using HDR-equipment, there’s no point on worrying about that.įor a long time, I’ve been a fan of GPU-rendering, and after spending so much on game development, I’d wish there were more GPU-rendering solutions for the kind of market V-Ray serves. Depending on the number of samples, the Nvidia AI denoiser will be just an approximation of the final image, though, so the usage of this method may really depend on the compromises the end user may want to take while working.Īnother limitation of the Nvidia AI denoiser is that you can’t output HDR images, so, again, it really depends on what the goal is.
0 kommentar(er)
